Skip to content
EDIV
  • Home
  • Spirituality & Psychology
  • Contact
  • Links
  • Misc/Diverse
  • EnglishEnglish
  • SvenskaSvenska
  • Search Icon

EDIV

Spirituality, Society & Psychology

Self-referentizing (S-type)

Self-referentizing (S-type)

2020-09-19 SH

Low level of maturity translated into spirituality. Maybe low talent. Or the opposite. Primitive defenses. Strong projection, possible exploitation of others. Border psychotic, delusions

Importantly understand that psychotic organizational level is not the same as "psychotic". Destructive sect leaders. The category is reserved for rare grave cases.

Example of destructive variant: Charles Manson? But it doesn't have to be something that goes out over others. It can also be a rather timid, own, childishly colored religiosity in, for example, someone sick.

How to compare with so-called primitive religions, which can exhibit many "psychotic" reasoning? That someone has to die to atone for the group's guilt. Spirit preservation.

Relaterade


1-This & that, 6-Leftovers from study

Post navigation

PREVIOUS
Types and Clusters
NEXT
Consolidating (C-type)
Comments are closed.

Categories in “Misc/Diverse”

  • 1-This & that (464)
  • 3-Workshop (1)
  • 5-A study on New Age Spirituality (56)
  • 6-Leftovers from study (253)
  • 8-Old stuff (3)
  • 9-My journey (6)

Tags in “Misc/Diverse”

animal rights astrology atheism Awe Carl Gustav Jung conspiracyism conspiracy theories conspirituality cults Deepak Chopra developmental psychology Elitism envy God graphology Gurus Hoax Image of God Irvin Yalom James W. Fowler Jiddu Krishnamurti Jules Evans light workers Martinus Cosmology Martinus Thomsen maturation errors mindfulness Pehr Granqvist personal development psychiatry Psychoanalysis Psychology of Religion Richard Dawkins Rituals Science Sigmund Freud spiritual development spirituality Spiritual Narcissism The unconscious Third Testament UFO veganism Western esotericism Zeitgeist

Latest posts in “Misc/Diverse”

  • Who is independent?
    “Still waiting for a qualified, independent socio-religio-philo-psychological etc study of this movement & its history. Independent in the sense of non-affiliated. I.e., by people who are […]
  • Narcissism and conspiracy beliefs
    Summer reading. Something to ponder on. Maybe one get some answers if and when one dives into the text. But a few thoughts only, based on the title and abstract. States and traits? Boosted narcissism […]
  • Atheistic spirituality?
    I wanted to write down some thoughts on “spirituality”… What do I think about with that? What attracts me? I don’t think I’m really interested in the subject in general. […]
  • A healthy faith in God?
    It’s such a big subject, that perhaps you shouldn’t even bother with. A mystery you just should leave behind? It easily gets into an emotional war of positions between for or against. […]
  • Live life
    “The acceptance or interest in things like reincarnation, omen, telepathy, communication with deceased relatives, etc., is big. While several of the beliefs and phenomena addressed in these […]
  • Freud and Atheism
    This is very thoughtful. I myself have great respect for Sigmund Freud, his thoughts on when religion can get problematic, but I do think Jones has an interesting point. […]
  • Spiritual confusion
    Why is it that so many people within “New Age spirituality” end up wrong & at odds with consensus on – in short – all the burning issues? 😳 First there was the climate […]

Most popular in “Misc/Diverse”

  • 4-(5) (ASIMC 1-5, quoted Fowler, et al.)
  • Summary discussion, group
  • "A Grand Theory"

Share

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.
Whoops! There was an error and we couldn't process your subscription. Please reload the page and try again.
stefan.hellsten@edivpsych.com
+46 (0)76-190 63 63
Kyndelsmässogränd 5, NB
Hägersten, Stockholm
Sweden
© 2022   All Rights Reserved.