Skip to content
EDIV
  • Home
  • Spirituality & Psychology
  • Contact
  • Links
  • Misc/Diverse
  • Search Icon

EDIV

Spirituality, Society & Psychology | Clinical Psychologist | Stockholm

Introduction

Introduction

2015-06-14 SH

Several independent studies in recent years have been able to show that the Swede harbors a multitude of notions of existence that science cannot prove. The acceptance or interest in things such as reincarnation, notice, astrology, telepathy and communication with deceased relatives is great (Boström, 2008, 16 July; Centre for Contemporary Analysis, 2009, February; Sjödin, 2002). The results are similar in other Western countries, such as the UNITED STATES (Harris Interactive, 2013, December) and the United Kingdom (Ipsos MORI, 2012).

While several of the beliefs and phenomena addressed in these surveys overlap with what is commonly called superstition and should have been able to coexist with the long-dominant religion, reincarnation is, for example, a comparatively exotic notion in a Christian cultural circle. In the studies mentioned above, the idea that the individual should be reborn in a new physical body is supported by about one in four respondents. Hammer (2004) writes that "In just forty years, reincarnation has gone from being a view spread among the members of some Theosophical and occult circles to becoming one of the most widely embraced religious beliefs of our time." 203).

It is probably possible to affirm the claims in these surveys with varying degrees of seriousness, conviction or staining. For some, such thoughts form part of a more or less coherent philosophy of life, with which they identify and are prepared to argue, while for others they do not have the same central meaning. Geels and Wikström (2006) propose a division into customers, seekers and core troops, the latter of which more closely embrace certain notions such as a well-thought-out worldview. When the idea of reincarnation and the like are part of a coherent thought system, it touches on what is commonly called the new age and parts of the so-called newness (Frisk, 1998). There are divided opinions on how this area should be defined or named. Frisk (2007b) suggests that researchers start from scratch and come up with statistical means to the appropriate categories.

In this study, "newness", "the new spirituality", "new age", with several terms, are used synonymously. What is meant is a largely disorganized spirituality with an individualistic, progressive view of reincarnation and karma, as well as with a notion that man is gradually evolving towards emotional and cognitive perfection.

Översikt Uppsats

Related


5-A study on New Age Spirituality

Post navigation

PREVIOUS
Emergence and background
NEXT
Intro
Comments are closed.
  • EnglishEnglish
  • SvenskaSvenska

Latest posts in “Misc/Diverse”

  • Atheistic spirituality?
    I wanted to write down some thoughts on “spirituality”… What do I think about with that? What attracts me? I don’t think I’m really interested in the subject in general. […]
  • A healthy faith in God?
    It’s such a big subject, that perhaps you shouldn’t even bother with. A mystery you just should leave behind? It easily gets into an emotional war of positions between for or against. […]
  • Live life
    “The acceptance or interest in things like reincarnation, omen, telepathy, communication with deceased relatives, etc., is big. While several of the beliefs and phenomena addressed in these […]
  • Freud and Atheism
    This is very thoughtful. I myself have great respect for Sigmund Freud, his thoughts on when religion can get problematic, but I do think Jones has an interesting point. […]
  • Spiritual confusion
    Why is it that so many people within “New Age spirituality” end up wrong & at odds with consensus on – in short – all the burning issues? 😳 First there was the climate […]
  • How to be on the right side of history?
    What does it mean to “be on the wrong side of history”? And what does it look like when you are? Is it the Left Party [former Communist party in Sweden] that does not want to agree to […]
  • Conflictualities
    I sat and thought about something. Because of things I’m reading too, of course. How fair, ethical is it to diagnose presidents from afar? And to what extent is it useful? Attempts are of […]

Most popular in “Misc/Diverse”

  • Atheistic spirituality?
  • A healthy faith in God?
  • Live life
  • Freud and Atheism
  • Spiritual confusion
  • How to be on the right side of history?
  • Conflictualities

Categories in “Misc/Diverse”

  • 1-This & that (462)
  • 3-Workshop (1)
  • 5-A study on New Age Spirituality (56)
  • 6-Leftovers from study (253)
  • 8-Old stuff (3)
  • 9-My journey (6)

Tags in “Misc/Diverse”

alternative therapy animal rights A second naivite atheism Awe Carl Gustav Jung collective quarrel conspiracy theories conspirituality cults developmental psychology Donald Trump Elitism envy Establishment God Gurus Hare Krishna Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn Hoax Image of God Jiddu Krishnamurti Jules Evans Martinus Cosmology Martinus Thomsen mental illness Mentality history Michael Farias mindfulness palmistry personal development psychiatry Psychoanalysis Psychology of Religion Science Sigmund Freud spiritual development spirituality Spiritual Narcissism Symbolism Third Testament veganism Western esotericism Ylva Häggström Zeitgeist

Share

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.
Whoops! There was an error and we couldn't process your subscription. Please reload the page and try again.
stefan.hellsten@edivpsych.com
+46 (0)76-190 63 63
Kyndelsmässogränd 5, NB
Hägersten, Stockholm
Sweden
© 2022   All Rights Reserved.