Skip to content
EDIV
  • Home
  • Spirituality & Psychology
  • Contact
  • Links
  • Misc/Diverse
  • Search Icon

EDIV

Spirituality, Society & Psychology | Clinical Psychologist | Stockholm

Definitions

Definitions

2015-10-28 SH

Already defining what religion is poses a difficult task for researchers. Hammer (2004) argues that this is in principle not possible, but suggests that "religions move with a set of symbols, stories, beliefs, and behaviors that ultimately refer to a persevering reality." 19). Spiro (1966, referenced in Rizzuto, 1979, p. Religion is "an institution consisting of culturally patterned interactions with culturally postulated superhuman beings." Bauman (1997) argues that "'Religion' belongs to a family of curious and often embarrassing concepts which one perfectly understands until one wants to define them" (s. 165). According to Carl Gustav Jung, writes Jones (1991), religion was

The traditional shepherd of the process of indiviuation. Its symbols and rituals resonate to those repressed but significant aspects of the unconscious, both individual and collective. Religion had served in the past to keep men and women open to their depths (Jones, 1991, p. 5).

In their study on popular religion in Dalarna, Frisk and Åkerbäck (2013) choose to define religion as a philosophy of life based on certain existential and super-empiric assumptions, namely "ideological elements that deal with the meaning of life, what happens after death or notions beyond an empirical basis such as notions of energy dimensions in the body or the existence of extrahuman beings" (p. 18).

In the English-speaking world, "spirituality" is used for a category that is superior religion. Does english "spirituality" have the same connotations that "spirituality" has in our language? Possibly not. To say "I am spiritual, but not religious" is perhaps somewhat more obliging than when, for example, the American says "I'm spiritual, but not religious". Chryssides (2007): "Finally, spirituality is about finding meaning in one's life: receiving guidance for life, obtaining answers to qustions about why we are here, what the purpose of life is, and what may happen after we die" (s. 14).

Then there is the great area of "neo-religion" (Frisk, 1998) which can be said to be a subdivision of spirituality/spirituality, but on the same level as religion. In religious research, however, such modern spirituality has so far been treated rigidly and seen as inferior or atypical compared to the major world religions (Sutcliffe & Gilhus, 2013, p. 2). Frisk (1998) has proposed two subcategories of neo-religion: "New Age" and "New Age". Representatives of the first category are often organized around a specific doctrine and clearer leadership (the author cites the Scientology movement and Hare Krishna as examples), while spirituality in the second category is more often disorganized or semi-organized and with a greater freedom for the individual to define his or her faith and how it should be practiced.

Översikt Textfragment

Related


1-This & that, 6-Leftovers from study

Post navigation

PREVIOUS
How to understand what happened?
NEXT
New age, div
Comments are closed.
  • EnglishEnglish
  • SvenskaSvenska

Latest posts in “Misc/Diverse”

  • Atheistic spirituality?
    I wanted to write down some thoughts on “spirituality”… What do I think about with that? What attracts me? I don’t think I’m really interested in the subject in general. […]
  • A healthy faith in God?
    It’s such a big subject, that perhaps you shouldn’t even bother with. A mystery you just should leave behind? It easily gets into an emotional war of positions between for or against. […]
  • Live life
    “The acceptance or interest in things like reincarnation, omen, telepathy, communication with deceased relatives, etc., is big. While several of the beliefs and phenomena addressed in these […]
  • Freud and Atheism
    This is very thoughtful. I myself have great respect for Sigmund Freud, his thoughts on when religion can get problematic, but I do think Jones has an interesting point. […]
  • Spiritual confusion
    Why is it that so many people within “New Age spirituality” end up wrong & at odds with consensus on – in short – all the burning issues? 😳 First there was the climate […]
  • How to be on the right side of history?
    What does it mean to “be on the wrong side of history”? And what does it look like when you are? Is it the Left Party [former Communist party in Sweden] that does not want to agree to […]
  • Conflictualities
    I sat and thought about something. Because of things I’m reading too, of course. How fair, ethical is it to diagnose presidents from afar? And to what extent is it useful? Attempts are of […]

Most popular in “Misc/Diverse”

  • Atheistic spirituality?
  • A healthy faith in God?
  • Live life
  • Freud and Atheism
  • Spiritual confusion
  • How to be on the right side of history?
  • Conflictualities

Categories in “Misc/Diverse”

  • 1-This & that (462)
  • 3-Workshop (1)
  • 5-A study on New Age Spirituality (56)
  • 6-Leftovers from study (253)
  • 8-Old stuff (3)
  • 9-My journey (6)

Tags in “Misc/Diverse”

animal rights astrology atheism Awe Carl Gustav Jung conspiracy theories conspirituality cults Deepak Chopra developmental psychology Elitism envy God graphology Gurus Hoax Image of God Irvin Yalom James W. Fowler Jeffrey Masson Jiddu Krishnamurti Jules Evans Magical thinking Martinus Cosmology Martinus Thomsen M D Faber mindfulness Non-duality personal development popular psychology Psychoanalysis Psychology of Religion R D Laing Rituals Science Sigmund Freud spiritual development spirituality Spiritual Narcissism The unconscious Third Testament Vaccine veganism Western esotericism Zeitgeist

Share

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.
Whoops! There was an error and we couldn't process your subscription. Please reload the page and try again.
stefan.hellsten@edivpsych.com
+46 (0)76-190 63 63
Kyndelsmässogränd 5, NB
Hägersten, Stockholm
Sweden
© 2022   All Rights Reserved.